To: | "RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] I had a reply in the contest from a fellow using cw for rtty |
From: | "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com> |
Reply-to: | Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com> |
Date: | Sun, 10 Feb 2013 21:14:01 -0800 |
List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
Yes, you definately didn't want to start printing CW with the mark signal in the middle of a picture being received :-) 73 Tom W7WHY Besides IDing on RTTY, you were required (on HF) to ID with telegraphy. You could use CW or FSK telegraphy. The simplest way to comply was to generate CW by keying your mark signal, but that would usually produce garbage print on the receiving end. To avoid that, lots of us used narrow shift (20 Hz or so) FSK for IDing. 73, Arliss W7XU _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] I had a reply in the contest from a fellow using cw for rtty, Arliss |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] I had a reply in the contest from a fellow using cwforrtty, Rick |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] I had a reply in the contest from a fellow using cw for rtty, Arliss |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] I had a reply in the contest from a fellow using cw for rtty, Kok Chen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |