RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Proposed "Retro RTTY Contest"

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Proposed "Retro RTTY Contest"
From: Kai <k.siwiak@ieee.org>
Reply-to: k.siwiak@ieee.org
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:13:43 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Bill

I do understand that you are joking of course, but spark-type emissions (class-B damped wave), while not legal in ham bands, are legal under Part 15, the subpart dealing with Ultra-wideband radio rules. No joke! Specifically:
§15.521   Technical requirements applicable to all UWB devices.
(i) The prohibition in §2.201(f) and 15.5(d) of this chapter against Class B (damped wave) emissions does not apply to UWB devices operating under this subpart.

73
Kai, KE4PT

On 12/6/2013 11:35 PM, Bill Turner wrote:
Proposed additional rules:

Spark gap transmitters only.
Coherer receivers only.

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>