I already sent a nastygram to my ARRL director about it. It's the same
text as their "clarification" from earlier. Lots of easy points to go after
in there.
Ron
K0IDT
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] How to submit a reply to a RM-11708 comment?
> If you believe the ARRL memorandum, you have something like until
> January 7 to submit a reply, I may have forgotten the exact date
> though.
ARRL's own "Comments of Petitioner" were filed over the weekend:
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7521063715. They provide an
attractive target for Reply Comments - particularly the assertion that
the petition "would *not* [their emphasis] ... B. Have any effect on CW
operation in the HF bands." or "the petition would not initiate any
broad plan to convert to regulation of emissions by bandwidth rather
than by emission type."
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|