RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo

To: <rtty@contesting.com>, "'John Becker'" <w0jab@big-river.net>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo
From: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 18:15:14 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
>>>AA6YQ comments below

-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of John Becker
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 6:09 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo


On 3/21/2014 4:54 PM, Ron Kolarik wrote:
> The Region 2 band plan segregates emissions by bandwidth, application 
> and mode.
> It also suggests "unattended" station use should be limited which is 
> the actual problem.
>
> 73,
> Ron
> K0IDT

But again allow me to point out that for some time now these stations have
been in their own sub band.

>>>Demonstrably false. Nowhere in part 97 are unattended stations in the US
granted exclusive access to any frequency or set of frequencies. Unattended
stations are expected to share frequencies with attended stations; among
other things, that means confirming that the frequency is clear before
transmitting. 


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>