Maybe. Its simply meant that we have to commit to the barefoot input of our
favoured rig, to a maximum of 100w.
You're right, how you get to 100w is not relivant. The rule says "no amp", so
no amps. This is not an ethical problem. Everyone will run 100w -
unquestioned. But, if my favoured rig is a 25yo Kenwood 850 in FSK, and it
can only muster 85w, then that's
all I get. If you bought a deluxe new rig, input 200 or 400w, great, invite
me over to see it. I bet you've got a tower to go with the rig.
...but you still dial it down to 100w. We all commit to 1 rig.
73
David
Sent from Samsung tablet
-------- Original message --------
From: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: 24/02/2015 22:16 (GMT-05:00)
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules
FT-102 does about 175 watts with 3 6146's in the final. 73
Tom W7WHY
>
> On 2/24/2015 12:56 PM, Cheryl Whitlock wrote:
>> My old Drake TR4-C puts out 300 watts. (smile).
>> On Feb 24, 2015 11:55 AM, "wo4o - RiC" <wo4o.radio@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Are there older transceivers (exciter alone) capable of more than 100 w
>>> output (no "external amplifier") for RTTY. That okay? <smile> 73, de
>>> ric,
>>> wo4o
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|