To: | "'RTTY Reflector'" <rtty@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating |
From: | "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com> |
Reply-to: | ed@w0yk.com |
Date: | Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:00:33 -0800 |
List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
I don't think the miniscule speed decrease is a factor. In my mind, it just looks silly to send 5NN on RTTY, because the CW technique of speedup is actually a slowdown on RTTY. OTOH CW ops are so used to it that perhaps it is a don't care. Ed W0YK Bill W6WRT wrote: Please don't send 5NN in place of 599. 5NN in RTTY requires an extra LTRS shift that actually slows things down. It's not much, but over hundreds or thousands of Qs it adds up. 5NN is fine for CW. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating, Jeff AC0C |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Decoder thoughts after WPX, Ed Muns |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating, Jeff AC0C |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating, Bill Turner |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |