| To: | RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RTTY] RTTY vs PSK31 on Field Day |
| From: | Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 24 Feb 2017 05:04:45 +0000 |
| List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped) On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 04:44:11 +0000 (UTC), Tim wrote: > In a real-life emergency would everyone crowd PSK signals into 2 -3 KHz? REPLY: In a real life emergency, the mode to use is SSB. It's much faster, doesn't require a computer and conveys urgency much better than any digital mode. I love the digital modes, but when life and/or property is at stake, give me a mike. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [RTTY] RTTY vs PSK31 on Field Day, Tim Goeppinger via RTTY |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] RTTY vs PSK31 on Field Day, Jim Rhodes |
| Previous by Thread: | [RTTY] RTTY vs PSK31 on Field Day, Tim Goeppinger via RTTY |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] RTTY vs PSK31 on Field Day, Jim Rhodes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |