SD-User
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [SD-User] SDI and Russian EU Ref Numbers

To: <sd-user@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [SD-User] SDI and Russian EU Ref Numbers
From: "Feddeweidema" <feddeweidema@orange.nl>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:20:23 +0200
List-post: <mailto:sd-user@contesting.com>
I noticed the same with the Russian stations
73 Fred PA0FAW

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Sergeant" <dave@davesergeant.com>
To: <sd-user@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: [SD-User] SDI and Russian EU Ref Numbers


> On 29 Jul 2007 at 15:59, THOMAS TAYLOR wrote:
> 
>> Hi Paul,
>>   During the 2007 IOTA Contest, SDI performed in its usual excellent
>>   manner - but I experienced a problem with a couple fo QSOs.
>> 
>>   When logging RI1AA, SDI showed EU... for completion   and I typed in
>>   133 ro make it EU133.    No Problem. However when logging RK3MWL/1
>>   and RI1CA - both who were saying they were EU133, once I hit ENTER
>>   after their Serial Number, the QSO was entered into the log -
>>   without giving me the opportunity to mark them as EU133 ( 15
>>   pointers instead of 3 pointers ). Is there a solution please?
>> 
>>   73 de Tom / G0PSE
> 
> Have you already worked them on a different band and logged them 
> without an IOTA reference? In these situations SD will assume the 
> previous QSO details were correct. You could get to the IOTA field by 
> using the tab key but it would probably object if you tried to change 
> it. Once you have worked a station it takes the same information for 
> subsequent QSOs with that station, if wrong you must edit the .ALL or 
> cabrillo afterwards.
> 
> 73 Dave G3YMC
> 
> http://www.davesergeant.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SD-User mailing list
> SD-User@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sd-user
> 
> 
>

_______________________________________________
SD-User mailing list
SD-User@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sd-user

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>