[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] 2.7 filters

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] 2.7 filters
From: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner WA3JPG)
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 1998 21:36:34 -0800
> From: Larry DiGioia <larryd@bright.net>
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: 2.7 filters
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Date: Wednesday, January 07, 1998 5:37 PM

> In discussions with Ten Tec engineers on the phone today, it was
> pointed out to me that using anything wider than the standard 2.4 KHz
> filters on the Omni VI  will cause spurious emissions, unsuppressed
> carrier, and generally catastrophic results.

Why would this be?  Another 300 Hz of bandwidth causes catastrophe?
Something seems amiss here.  I have used wider filters in other 
rigs, and I know my carrier is still down as much as it needs to
be etc.  Can anyone explain?


FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>