I tried to respond directly, but got an unable-to-deliver message
saying your domain was refusing the message (guess it won't
accept personal messages during business hours...hi...
Here's my response, though....
I don't believe Ten-Tec manufactures a general coverage ham
If they did, then maybe there would be more reason/need for AM.
But, in a ham band only radio?? I don't think it's needed.
From: Marchitelli, Nick #45CS/SCBBH
To: firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com>
Date: Thursday, January 29, 1998 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] The demise of manufacture
>Why make a general coverage receiver that has no AM
>sense to me
>Don't get me wrong, I luv my Ten-tec but if they had AM they
would be the
>I occasionally listen to AM on 3.885, its different, fun and
>Am is also popular on 20m and 10m when the band opens more
>All that money for the IV and no AM???
>to each his own I guess
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com