[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Ten Tec Cure for Clicking Omni 6 a No Go

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Ten Tec Cure for Clicking Omni 6 a No Go
From: peplasters@rockford.com (Paul Plasters)
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 06:15:31 -0600
Hi Steve and ALL;
In light of this report, I would say it looks like an adjustment problem,
IE it may be adjusted out using an alignment procedure, or adjusted in
using the same alignment procedure depending on ????? (some components etc.
73 Paul K9PEP

At 11:02 AM 11/22/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Having had no less than 2 Omni V1's, I can vouch for the click. A friend of
>mine bought a brand new Omni VI Plus and it had the same problem. Here are
>some things I remember
>1. The click was only noticable when using QSK Fast mode.
>2. It varied per band.
>3. Changing the passband tuning had an effect on it. Click was worse
>    when passband was centered.
>4. Reducing the RF Gain reduced the click
>5. Slow QSK mode tended to eliminate it.
>6. Using an external DSP...MFJ, I was able to totally eliminate the
>    click. Very little processing was needed.
>7. Using headphones would drive anyone nuts.
>8. Click was worse on rig nr. 1 and not so bad on nr 2. No two Omni
>    VI's alike!
>9. Wish I had know about connector 52 back then.
>Question: Is there a possibility that disconnection connector 52 lengthens
>the delay and thus slowing the qsk? IF so, this ain't playing fair.
>So I went back to the Omni V with it's better keying and no click.
>Don't get to excited though because TenTec used 3 different methods of
>switching in the front end. Diode, relay and transistor.  Some might click
>and some might not.
>Now if we could just eliminate the white noise from the mixers.......
>And BTW. Don't go thinking that JA rigs have any better qsk. Only a few do.
>But then you have other problems like chopped dits and ringy filters.
>Steve N4LQ
>>Disconnecting plug 52 did not reduce the speaker/headphone click
>>when I performed this mod 3 weeks ago. I agree that it is ANNOYING
>>and NOT in keeping w/ the performance I expect from a Ten Tec,
>>a rig known for it's cw prowess.
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
>Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>