[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Service Comments

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Service Comments
From: zeitler@ibm.net (zeitler@ibm.net)
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 05:26:13 -0800
Pete, et al,
I agree 100%. I have been totally satisfied with their service for the past
18 years of using T-T gear off and on over the years. Like everything else,
there are unique circumstances that do occur and apparently this unsatisfied
customer had a "Ten Tec Bad Hair Day". I will continue to do business with a
company who is on target 99.99999% of the time with their customer service.

Lane Zeitler
San Diego
John 3:3-5
-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Burbank <plburbank@kih.net>
To: tentec@contesting.com <tentec@contesting.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Friday, November 27, 1998 10:20 PM
Subject: [TenTec] Service Comments

>A recent post criticized Ten-Tec service. To me that's amazing!
>Some mix-up in communication must have occured.
>T-T has always had a reputation for outstanding ....I mean REALLY
>OUTSTANDING SERVICE and in my case it has always been true. I'm
>not a big spender with them but they have always treated me like
>I was. I wish that the rest of the world was as great as these guys.
>Happy Holidays to all and especially All Y'All in Tennessee.
>Pete  W4VCT
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
>Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>