TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] May 1999 QST, Page 111

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] May 1999 QST, Page 111
From: aa5f@scott.net (Jim)
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 00:38:52 +0100
It appears that, at least, the sales staff listen. I'd also like to see
photos of Garland Jenkins and Larry Worth. IMHO, they (and the other service
folks) are the REAL celebrities at Ten Tec.

                                Jim   AA5F

-----Original Message-----
From: randas@mindspring.com <randas@mindspring.com>
To: Dale L. Martin <kg5u@hal-pc.org>; Ten-Tec Reflector
<Tentec@contesting.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tuesday, April 13, 1999 12:11 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] May 1999 QST, Page 111


>
>I do believe the Ten-Tec Sunday net is on (or close) to that freq. So the
>factory listens to the net..??
>
>de Tim  K0FL
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dale L. Martin <kg5u@hal-pc.org>
>To: Ten-Tec Reflector <Tentec@contesting.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
>Date: Monday, April 12, 1999 6:39 PM
>Subject: Re: [TenTec] May 1999 QST, Page 111
>
>
>>
>>I don't follow, Mike.  What's the significance (to you) of
>>14280.11 kHz (+RIT of 0.11 kHz)?
>>
>>Scot and Stan have the radio set up fairly well: mic gain at 10
>>o'clock, PWR at max, NB at full CCW, PBT at 12 o'clock, AF at
>>minimum, S-meter shows minimum--rightly so: Meter switch is in
>>Proc position, USB LED is on, RIT LED is on, LP and DSP LED's are
>>on, Keyer speed looks nominal, but Processor control looks a bit
>>high (11 o'clock?)
>>
>>I give them credit.  At least the radio looks like it's set up
>>well and it's in the ham band--interestingly, on a frequency
>>which we at Johnson Space Center ARC designated a long time ago
>>as one of our internally  suggested operating frequencies to make
>>it easy for the ham population to find us during missions or
>>whenever we get on and operate.
>>
>>Nice twist of marketing strategy.  Personally, I've felt exactly
>>that way many times and worry often, but about if Ten-Tec becomes
>>TOO popular, their personalized service may suffer.
>>
>>
>>
>>.
>>73,
>>dale, kg5u
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Michael A. Newell <wb4huc@texas.net>
>>To: tentec@contesting.com <tentec@contesting.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
>>Date: Monday, April 12, 1999 17:21 PM
>>Subject: [TenTec] May 1999 QST, Page 111
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Did anyone besides me notice the frequency
>>>the rig in the new ad was showing?
>>>
>>>Maybe the first person to make mention
>>>of it will win a new one as a prize??? (hint, hint).
>>>
>>>73,
>>>
>>>Mike -- WB4HUC
>>>Austin, TX
>>>http://wb4huc.home.texas.net/omni-vi/ - The UNofficial OMNI
>>>VI Web Site
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>FAQ on WWW:
>>http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
>>>Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
>>>Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
>>>Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
>>>Search:
>>http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
>>Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
>>Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
>>Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
>>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
>Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>