Excuse me....I am quite pleased with my $200 Omni C. Talk about easy!
If I paid $3,000 for a rig with twirpy keying and about the same
amount of drift as my 20 yr old radio I might be a bit edgy too. I
could either get rid of it or become defensive and deny it's anything
but perfect. Woe be to anyone who says bad things about my investment.
Well enough....I think I'll look around 40m for a few Cubans and give
some bad signal reports.
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael O. Hyder <N4NT@wireco.net>
To: Robert Wooldridge <email@example.com>; Contesting TenTec
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni Vi freq drift and poor keyer?
> Geez, Bob, that review was written by Steve N4LQ. You couldn't
> if you were giving away money.
> Regards, Mike N4NT@wireco.net
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Robert Wooldridge <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: Contesting TenTec <email@example.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 1:51 PM
> Subject: [TenTec] Omni Vi freq drift and poor keyer?
> > All,
> > This review of the Omni VI+ indicates that it suffers
> > from frequency drift and that the cw keying is the
> > worst on the market. Can anyone verify these
> > comments?
> > (See the 4th review down)
> > http://www.eham.net/reviews/?review_list=45
> > =====
> > -Bob Wooldridge KC0DXF
> > -Web Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > -Web: http://www.qsl.net/kc0dxf/
> > -See Also: http://www.anet-stl.com/~mcsg/
> > -Via HAM radio repeaters in St. Louis: 146.85, 442.10
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
> Submissions: email@example.com
> Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com