TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] eHam reviews....

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] eHam reviews....
From: duffyb01@fuse.net (J. Duffy Beischel)
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 20:17:38 -0400
If I were Scott, I consider withdrawing all advertisements from eHam until they 
start acting responsibly.  Second, if the 
guy has reservations about TT, TT probably does not want to advertise with them 
anyway. I mean I would not want to 
put my money where it's not appreciated and the other company does not respect 
your product.

As for the other happy TT owners out there, keep those positive posting coming 
and if the children keep posting 
negative ones over and over, keep posting the postive ones over and over.  And 
if you have a friend that has a Jupiter, 
make sure you post those third party impressions since eHam says it is o.k.  
Help your friends out.

Duffy
www.wb8nut.com

4/26/2002 12:53:03 PM, Robert & Rebecca Coykendall <becnbob@succeed.net> wrote:

>After extended communications with eHam's Reviews editor,  I came to the
>conclusion that eHam accepts 2nd hand submissions as valid... which violates
>any sense of fairness... as there have been several Jupiter reviews that
>have been submitted by 'friends' of Joop owners... and interestingly, all
>have been very negative in their assessments.  Some of the most negative
>reviews clearly demonstrate that their authors were clueless in learning the
>very basics of Jupiter operation, thus their criticisms were essentially
>bogus.  One lid didn't even know how to change the Joop's display contrast.
>
>If one carefully examines these nefarious reviews, one will quickly come to
>the conclusion that these are nothing more than 'hit pieces' against Ten-Tec
>in general and the Jupiter specifically... and if I were Scott Robbins, I
>would write a news article for submission to eHam to set the record
>straight... and name some names... or should I say call signs, of eHam
>review writers that never even bought Jupiters from Ten-Tec.  He should have
>this information readily at hand, as Ten-Tec only sells Jupiters from its
>factory.
>
>The eHam editor even admitted that he had reservations(read: bias) about
>Ten-Tec product quality.... thus I think we Jupiter owners need to take eHam
>reviews with a grain of salt or complain to the Reviews editor directly, as
>I've done several times.  I feel I have been successful in having a few of
>these obvious 'hit pieces' expunged and the editor told me that they
>generally outlaw repetitive reviews of particular products by a single
>'reviewer' - unless it is a follow-up review offering new useful, or
>corrective information.
>
>Just my 2¢ worth....
>
>Bob
>ad6vu@arrl.net
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>



______________________________________________________________________
J. Duffy Beischel - Amateur Radio WB8NUT - http://www.wb8nut.com

Member of: ARRL, NRA, Kiwanis, Republican Party, Masons, and Shriners
and the vast Right Wing conspiracy to get the Clintons

"If the government owned all the guns, would we still be a free people?"

"Taxation WITH Representation is not that great either."
______________________________________________________________________




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>