| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] Argo review |
| From: | Christopher Svenstedt <toffe@svenstedt.com> |
| Reply-to: | Christopher Svenstedt <sm5vxc@svenstedt.com>, tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Mon, 03 Mar 2003 19:27:51 +0100 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hi all, He.. I'm actually quoted in the review. And that's my opinion. The original 706 is a whole lot less radio then the Argo V. Despite all nuts and bolts, bells and whistles. Let the rise burn in the stow. You may think this is a superficious not in dept opinion, and you may have a point... Okay, I confess, I had a ruff day at work today.... Regards /SM5VXC >The Argo V review that will be in the April 2003 issue of QST is now >posted on the ARRL website |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] QST review of the Argonaut V, Michael A. Newell, WB4HUC |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Orion at Charlotte, Stuart Rohre |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] QST review of the Argonaut V, Michael A. Newell, WB4HUC |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] RE: RFI and Behringer MX-602a, Hsu, Aaron |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |