TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Wide SSB

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] Wide SSB
From: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 00:23:55 +0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>


"There is a rule in part 97 about using the minimum spectrum required for the communications, right next to the one about using the minimum
POWER..."

I do not argue with the FCC's intent here however, if we follow an extremely literal interpretation of this to the maximum extent allowed by analog technology, the resulting "taliban audio" would be a nasal, metalic kind of mechanical sound that would make everyone sound like space aliens on a Star Trek episode. I think there's a happy and reasonable medium in there somewhere between the 3.9 Khz allowed by the Jupiter and the traditional utilitarian sound of the older sideband rigs. I find a 2.5 - 2.8 khz wide signal much more pleasant to listen to. If a band plan agreement to put these on 15 and 75 where there's more space comes about so be it, but to squelch any attempt to try something new does not seem to be part of the amateur spirit to me. Besides, who wants to sound like they're on the telephone or a 2m repeater? If I want that I'll make a phone call. I've tried 10 m. FM. I found it remarkable for it's blandness and lack of character. May as well be on an internet chat room or whatever those voice links are called.

73,

Rob Atkinson
K5UJ
k5uj@hotmail.com

Note to prevent further embarrassment: Regardless of what my earlier message said, I did know that 20 has an additional 50 Khz over the 40 phone allocation, but I won't be surprised if you don't believe me. : )





_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [TenTec] Wide SSB, Rob Atkinson, K5UJ <=