TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] RE: Topband Digest, Vol 6, Issue 20

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] RE: Topband Digest, Vol 6, Issue 20
From: lodahlkh@charter.net (Keith Lodahl)
Date: Tue Jun 24 16:29:52 2003
I will give you $150.00 and a FT757GX plus pay shipping both ways.

Keith Lodahl
KB9NUM NNN0ACS NNN0GCE ONE
President, Rock River Radio Club
ARRL Official Emergency Station
ARRL Public Information Officer
ARRL Volunteer Examiner
920-387-4675
kb9num@charter.net



> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Dave Heil
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 1:38 PM
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] RE: Topband Digest, Vol 6, Issue 20
> 
> 
> WD4K wrote:
> > 
> > This Orion testing has gone from questionable to absolutely ridiculous.
> > Isn't anyone here going to question statements of personal 
> opinion cloaked
> > as fact??
> 
> For days now I've been sitting and reading these comparisons and I'm
> beginning to think that I have no idea what makes a good receiver and
> what makes a bad receiver.  Over the past twenty or so years I've owned
> Drake ("full Sherwood") C-Lines, TR-7's, the Ten-Tec Paragon and the
> Omni VI (option 3).  I've used TS-930's, TS-940's, TS-950's, TS-830's,
> TS-850's, TS-870's, FT-1000D's, FT-1000MP's, FT-1000MP Mk V's, FT-1000MP
> Fields and, oh yes, FT-757's (various incarnations).  I've had the Orion
> for about a month-and-a-half.  It has been my opinion that it has the
> finest receiver I've ever used.  Now I'm filled with self-doubt.  I'm
> beginning to think I should sell the piece of crap and buy a second-hand
> FT-757 ;-)
> 
> What to do, what to do...
> 
> Dave Heil K8MN
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>