> the initial posting. I checked the current online version and 63/63
> is indeed what it says, but the printed copy I made yesterday says
> 77/73 on the same page 21. Apparently the original QST numbers are
> correct
Given that the spec for IP2 is +75dBm, I hope T-T will take a look at what
caused this discrepancy -- and whether it was an anomaly of the radio
that ARRL had for test, or whether it effects 'em all.
Grant/NQ5T
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|