TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Spectrum Hogs

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Spectrum Hogs
From: "JERRY JUDY" <ke8npjmj@ameritech.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 07:34:40 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Now I want to jump in here with the big question. What iis the proper width
of a normal or rather accepted SSB signal?????       KE8NP








----- Original Message -----
From: <KD7EFQ@aol.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 7:26 AM
Subject: [TenTec] Spectrum Hogs


> On Dec 17th, @23:44, al_lorona wrote "HRT: I think I need a Drink"
>
>   If this post was in any way an attempt to justify and condone 3kc' and
> wider spectrum consumption for SSB operation, I suggest you don't need a
drink,
> you need an AA 12 step meeting, as it demonstrates alcoholic thinking. I
am
> trying to take it as tongue in cheek humor and nothing more. Hopefully,
that's all
> that was intended.
>
>  I suggest if you want broadcast quality audio, get some old AM gear and
play
> with the AM boys. SSB was never intended to sound like AM. It was designed
> primarily for two reasons,
> 1: more efficient use of RF Power.  2: to occupy LESS bandwidth.
>
>
> 73, Todd - KD7EFQ
>
> "The Race is over...THE RATS WON!"
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>