TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Roofing filters

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Roofing filters
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 14:01:57 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>

Is this how the Omni VI and Omni VI accomodate FM?

Some multimode radios with FM have a separate IF and detector just for the FM, and may have a narrower roofing filter in the IF used for the other modes.

Yes, and there is another reason that you may as well use a whole separate IF for narrow band FM detection. With wideband FM, like 75 kHz used in broadcast FM, a discriminator circuit operating at an IF frequency of typically 10.7 MHz will have plenty of audio output from a wideband FM signal. When the FM deviation (modulation) is only several kHz wide, you can get more audio voltage out of the discriminator circuit if it is operating at a much lower frequency (typically 455 kHz) so that the FM deviation is a higher percentage of the IF frequency where the discriminator is operating. Most narrow band FM capable receivers (including the Omni VI) eventually convert the higher IF down to 455 kHz to do the FM detection. Some of the JA rigs get the high IF after the roofing filter, before sending it on to a FM IF which downconverts to 455 kHz. Ten-Tec did "the right thing" and tapped it off before the roofing filter, instead of compromising performance for SSB and CW by using a wide roofing filter. Using a wider roofing filter also allows the bandbass tuning or IF shift to work over a wider frequency range. Which I think is kind of neat, but I really like the close in strong signal rejection of the Omni VI. You can't have it both ways.

Ken N6KB


_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>