On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Grant Youngman wrote:
> > have folded a while back. Don't get me wrong - I love my TT radios,
> > but they do need to improve their communications and attitudes in
> some
> > areas.
>
> Of the vendors whose radios I've owned, T-T is the only one I would ever
> contemplate using the word "responsive" with. If there's an attitude
> (good, bad, or mixed) , at least there's enough communication to know
> there IS one :-)
My experiences with picking up the phone and calling Ten-Tec has been as
good as it gets. Email is fine but it's as weak as the excuse "the dog
ate my homework" - if you've got something to say, use the phone or write
a letter. As much email as there is to handle at Ten-Tec i'm sure it's a
fulltime job for someone to wade through it. And we know they do read it
'cause I always get a reply from Stan or Scott.
And as Stan's told me a number of times: the more people email a request
to ditsnbits the more likely it will be implemented. One guy emailing
them for a request isn't likely to see it done unless it's some hugely
obvious request that should be satisfied.
"Take it away, Leon, take it away..." - Bob Wills
73 Jason N1SU
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|