TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ARRL's BPL NPRM response is out

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL's BPL NPRM response is out
From: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 15:24:45 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Accumulated BPL interfering noise was addressed in the ARRL document as
something that had not been tested by BPL proponents.   A strong point was
made that part 15 applies to point sources like a device, while BPL is a
line source since it is continuously radiated by the lines.   They also made
good point that FCC was overlooking the laws of physics in neglecting the
continuous radiation from a line.
Stuart
K5KVH


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>