Wow, what I don't get is how this comes back to 2 receivers vs. 2 VFO's.
It's only a suggestion to improve the usefulness of a top notch radio.
Today the setup is more clumsy than it needs to be. That's all we're
discussing, folks. But, I think we've beat this dead horse into
hamburger.
73, Duane
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 12:25:11 +0000 "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com>
writes:
> What I get from this discussion is the inability of some users to
> relate to
> TWO RECEIVERS instead of the normal two VFO's on ONE RECEIVER.
>
> Now, have them put two VFO's on each receiver for a total of four.
> Mind
> blowing.
>
>
> 73
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's
> FREE!
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
Duane Calvin, AC5AA
Austin, Texas
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|