| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] An example of changing Orion firmware to meetexpectations of the operator. |
| From: | "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:57:40 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Scott, > -- VFO's are not receivers -- How does one define what is a property of the VFO and what is the property of the receiver? I would assume from the design that BW and PBT are functions of the receiver that the VFO should be limited to frequency setting. If that is the case, why does the tuning step size appear to be a function of the receiver? In fact this can result in some confusion (which tuning step size to use) when both receivers are tied to the same VFO. 73, Mark _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Using Orion and CT ... ?, NJ0IP |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Orion Losing RX Audio, Duane A Calvin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] An example of changing Orion firmware to meetexpectations of the operator., Ken & Linda Burrough |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Step size, Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |