TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion vs Omni 6+ agc

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion vs Omni 6+ agc
From: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:23:07 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The agc in the Omni 6+ seems to handle QRN better than the Orion no 
matter how much I fiddled with all those agc menu settings, cw characters 
would get blipped out on my Orion. The ProII was better but the Omni 6+ 
out does them both in that respect. As a matter of fact, the 6+ has the 
first AGC I have ever seen that works correctly in "fast" mode. No 
overshoot at all. I just leave it on fast. 

After the cable 52 removal mod, the Omni 6+ has a sidetone with such 
purity that brings tears to the eyes. But best of all, there are no 
clicks, thumps, grunts or groans in the headphones when running QSK.

So I don't see the 6+ becoming a back up rig for some time now. 

-----Original Message-----
From: KD7EFQ@aol.com
To: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:14:02 EDT
Subject: [TenTec] Orion vs Omni 6+

> Hello all, I cannot justify an Orion Purchase yet, and my Omni 6+ is
> still 
> rated in the top 6 receivers ever, so I'll be keeping mine. Keep
> watching for 
> INRAD's roofing filter mod for the 6+, as I understand it will give
> close in 
> dynamic range numbers quite a bit closer to Orion specs. Then it will
> relly be a 
> backup rig worthy of staying on the bench and not in a box in the
> closet. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 73, Todd - KT0DD - kd7efq@aol.com
> 
> "The race is over...THE RATS WON !"
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>