TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
From: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:43:34 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
It's  an old thread Blair. Talking about it on this reflector did not get it
changed, rehashing it will not either.

Tom - W4BQF


----- Original Message -----
From: <Ynkedragon@aol.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 3:27 PM
Subject: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK


> In a message dated 08/17/2004 13:01:41 Eastern Daylight Time,
> aldermant@alltel.net writes:
>
> << Yes! >>
> Just so I'm clear on this, you have problems with high speed CW, using
either
> an internal keyer, or an external keyer, with any/all Ten-Tec radios?  If
> that's the case, what do you like as a CW transceiver?
>
> 73,  Blair k3yd
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>