Thankfully, someone's spam killer has appropriately started naming this
thread!
73, Duane
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Ynkedragon@aol.com>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 3:27 PM
> Subject: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
>
>
> > In a message dated 08/17/2004 13:01:41 Eastern Daylight Time,
> > aldermant@alltel.net writes:
> >
> > << Yes! >>
> > Just so I'm clear on this, you have problems with high speed CW,
> using
> either
> > an internal keyer, or an external keyer, with any/all Ten-Tec
> radios? If
> > that's the case, what do you like as a CW transceiver?
> >
> > 73, Blair k3yd
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
--------------------------------------
Duane Calvin, AC5AA
Austin, Texas
http://home.austin.rr.com/ac5aa
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|