TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Alas, not for me

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Alas, not for me
From: "Ron Notarius" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:24:35 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
But John,

There already IS a successor to the Pegasus.  In development, they called it
the Pegasus FP, but we now know it as the Jupiter.

You don't need a computer to run the Jupiter.  You can sit down in front of
it and operate it via the good old fashioned Front Panel.

So go have fun.  And don't worry about being "digitally challenged."

73

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Rippey" <w3uls@3n.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 5:22 PM
Subject: [TenTec] Alas, not for me


> If, as has been speculated, Ten-Tec may come out with a successor to the
> Pegasus, there's no doubt  that such a product would be able to do all
> kinds of neat digital things. One example of where things are going in the
> retail digital world is the new Apple iMac, announced today, which has so
> many gee-whiz functions for consumers that it makes just doing word
> processing and running Quicken sound like the Dark Ages. (I do not believe
> it includes a Morse code reader, however.)
>
> For those digitally challenged like myself, it does not take much to be
> overkill in the area of home computers, let alone in ham radio. So I wish
> T-T well, if indeed it may be heading deeper into software-driven devices,
> but such progress is, alas, not for me.
>
> And it does appear that's where the hobby is headed, and I guess it better
> be--if it wants to have any appeal at all to twenty-somethings.
>
> 73,
> John, W3ULS
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>