TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec] Alas, not for me

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec] Alas, not for me
From: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 10:48:01 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
In re the analog/DSP circuitry in the TS-870: The INRAD mod is an imaginative exercise in making a good radio perform better; it certainly is not what one would do if you were designing a new TS-870 derivative from scratch. In other words, it is not a fix that will make it into a textbook.

Duane argues for a clean-sheet design for amateur gear, where in effect there would be no "radio" and no "computer" per se, but an entirely new hybrid. Thinking outside the box. I appreciate the argument, but probably would not be happy with the outcome :-)

I admit I like to look at those dumb, static displays and panels--they're pleasing to me. My current favorite to watch is an FT-920. Now that's retro. I don't have the mental horsepower to process the kind of info Duane does; all I can do is stand back and marvel at such multi-tasking brainpower.

Finally, with the new roofing filters forthcoming from INRAD, a bunch of older radios soon are going to have sterling dynamic range capabilities, and you won't have to jump through hoops like the mods required on the TS-870, or shell out big bucks. OMNI VI owners will have the choice of a 2800 or 400 Hz filter (!) Two OMNIs would give you some great performance possibilities in CW and SSB contests.

I wonder if George's new filters will have the effect of discouraging introduction of new ham rigs since the older ones are being given such powerful new legs?

73,
John, W3ULS


_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>