TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Looking for Omni-546C

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Looking for Omni-546C
From: k2zn@rochester.rr.com
Reply-to: k2zn@rochester.rr.com, tentec@contesting.com
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:45:44 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Yup, I've had dismal results with DSP boxes as well.  They provide hundreds of 
microseconds of delay, if not milliseconds; ADC bit noise as well.  

The FL3 delay is in the tens of microseconds; comparisons between that and the 
internal audio filter didn't yield any appreciable differences with regard to 
the pop.

I did manage to reduce the pop by putting an emitter follower between the audio 
sample point and the input of the AGC circuit.  I imagine a source follower 
would work even better.

Al

----- Original Message -----
From: Steve N4LQ <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 12:29 pm
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Looking for Omni-546C

> I tried putting a DSP filter inside the agc loop on a Triton and 
> it made the 
> pop problem a 100 times worse due to the log delay. Don't count on 
> that 
> working.
> Steve N4LQ
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <k2zn@rochester.rr.com>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 12:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Looking for Omni-546C
> 
> 
> > An even better implementation of the SCAF filter would be to get 
> it within 
> > the audio AGC loop. I set up my Omni A that way with a Datong 
> FL3 - 
> > outstanding!
> >
> > Al, K2ZN
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>