TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Non-Confusion

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Non-Confusion
From: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:25:57 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
John:
Where did that relay that grounds the RX ant. input come from? Is it a 
little reed relay?
Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: John <w3uls@3n.net>
To: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:59:18 -0500
Subject: [TenTec] OMNI VI Non-Confusion

> In a very interesting post, Steve, N4LQ, wrote:
> 
> "Personally, I would much prefer the old Omni VI 563 with all the
> upgrades I 
> could get. Yes, you still have to contend with the IF boards being SMD
> but 
> at least the control board has good ole leaded parts."
> 
> Well, well, some of us w/o such technical expertise just stumble into a
> good thing.
> My c. 1994 OMNI VI upgraded to Opt. 3 has a tcxo, a relay that grounds
> the aux rx antenna
> during transmission, competent audio even before installing the INRAD
> stuff, and plug #52
> disconnected for a cleaner sidetone. IMHO not only may there be
> considerable variation
> in the parts/wiring of OMNI VIs as they came off the assembly line from
> 1992-2001, but
> some just seem to work better than others.
> 
> Sample variations are not just limited to Ten-Tec transceivers, I've
> found.
> That's just one of the unavoidable limitations of reviews of one sample
> such as carried in QST and elsewhere. I think Mike Tracy has said ARRL
> labs
> does do a cross-check with another sample when it can, but it is not
> the 
> thorough examination given to the test sample.
> 
> Certainly keeps things interesting :-)
> 
> 73,
> John, W3ULS 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>