I have found the hardware noise blanker works great for pulse noise. Have
you tried it when your neighbor's work shop is running?
Carl Moreschi N4PY
Franklinton, North Carolina
n4py@earthlink.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Cunnings" <cunnings@lectrosonics.com>
To: <msembx-aa6e@yahoo.com>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"
<tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion Processing
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Martin AA6E
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 3:56 PM
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion Processing
>
> Martin asks:
>
> >> What would you do with faster DSP parts?
>
> Although merely responding to the request for DSP chip "numbers", one
> thought does come to mind now that you mention it... noise reduction. It
> would be ok with me if the radio of the future (using the faster DSP parts
> of the future) spent the extra cycles implementing a better noise blanker.
>
> My neighbors's power tools in his workshop are driving me nuts!
>
> RC
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|