| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] OT: It's a pity |
| From: | ron <roncasa@verizon.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:07:37 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 16:46, Ed wrote: > As my beloved Grandpa would have said " I don't give a rats patooey". > Its a product review article, not the plans for an atomic bomb. I'll bet > TT even has a downloaded reprint floating around. > > Ed W3NR I concur Ron wb1hga _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] QST magazines, David McClafferty |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] TT vs. Palstar Antenna Tuner, n4in |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OT: It's a pity, Ed |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] apparent match possible in T Tuner, Bill Rowlett |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |