| To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Flex-Radio compared to Pegasus |
| From: | "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Jun 2005 18:18:47 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hi, If original ARRL review was working on incorrect Flex instructions, then they may have an update of Flex Radio review on the ARRL web site. they have an extended tests section of reviews. However, if Flex did not furnish another correctly configured unit, maybe not. -Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ Metering issue, Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Flex-Radio compared to Pegasus, Stuart Rohre |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Flex-Radio compared to Pegasus, Duane - N9DG |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Flex-Radio compared to Pegasus, Duane - N9DG |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |