TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] TenTec CW filters or Inrad?

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec CW filters or Inrad?
From: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:27:16 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Someone might correct me on this, but I think the INRAD filters have 3-4db
more insertion loss.

John N1JM 

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Jim Reid
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 3:24 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec CW filters or Inrad?


> How good are the TenTec CW filters?  Are they good or should I go with 
> Inrad?  TenTec 250 and 500 hz filters are both 6 pole.  I think 
> Inrad's are 8.

The Inrad filters have the steeper skirts,  but.......the response rises up
again a ways out!!  The Ten Tec filters do NOT.  So,  sort of depends upon
what you want the filter to accomplish.  I had an Omni VI+ loaded with Inrad
filters for a couple of years.  Sold it.

Now have an Omni VI,  Opt 3. with all Ten Tec filters.

That is how I voted.

73,  Jim W6KPI/KH6 ( used to be KH7M, but went back to my 1950's call.)
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>