TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] (no subject)

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] (no subject)
From: We5f@aol.com
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 09:46:09 EST
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Shouldn't that be CMLV?

(HI)  73, Jim KM5M
---------------------
We don't stop playing because we get old, we get old because we stop playing.




------------------------------

>>>From: "Mike Hyder  -N4NT-" <n4nt_m_o_hyder@charter.net>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Any reason not to use 960p/s with Omni V? (no
    message)
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Message-ID: <000901c612bc$dc17d9a0$0300a8c0@DESKTOP>
Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="iso-8859-1"

960 exceeds V by CML.  This will create an inverted nomenclature designation.<
<<

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [TenTec] (no subject), We5f <=