| To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Rephrasing the Big Question... |
| From: | "Don and Diana Cunningham" <wb5hak@duracom.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 6 Jan 2006 11:59:01 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Louis, I would think it would be fine. Says 20 amp under load, 22 amps for five minutes, so according to my Omni V manual that should be fine. You can look up the older Ten Tec stuff at www.qsl.net/tentec and see specifications, etc. I guess the guys just have "cabin fever" this week and straight answers are few and far between, hi. 73, Don, WB5HAK _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Rephrasing the Big Question..., Mike Hyder -N4NT- |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar, Carter, K8VT |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Rephrasing the Big Question..., Mike Hyder -N4NT- |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Rephrasing the Big Question..., Darwin, Keith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |