[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] QST AD

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] QST AD
From: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:50:45 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>

 >I'd like to see harder hitting reviews with some critical discussion.   The
only place you can get the ugly side of things is by reading the  comments on
eHam and they are not very scientific.

         Don't read QST or eHam reviews.  Learn to read
ARRL's Expanded Test Reports.  The real unvarnished
data is there if you know how to interpret it.  If
you don't, read KC1SX's article here:


                                         73,  Bill  W4ZV

TenTec mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>