[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] QST AD

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] QST AD
From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Reply-to: Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:51:10 -0800
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I think this was the one:

a.. Bose sued Consumer Reports in 1973 and initially won, however they lost 
on appeal in 1984. Bose initially won because Consumer Reports could not 
prove that its statement, "worse, individual instruments heard through the 
Bose system seemed to grow to gigantic proportions and tended to wander 
about the room.", was "worse".

I didn't realize that the case was overturned.

Ron Castro
Chief Technical Officer
Results Radio, LLC

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Manship" <mjmanship@iquest.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] QST AD

> Quoting Bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net>:
>> ron wrote:    bose sued...because of:
>> >n extremely negative review on a set of Bose speakers.  Bose
>> >successfully sued under a business defamation cause of action which left 
>> >a
>> >'
>> having spend over 20 years representing JBL & JBL PRO products I was
>> curious to read about it . I googled  Bose VS and found his son is
>> suing MIT over rights to a "software radio "  he developed on MIT 
>> time....
>> this could be cool,,,, aside from Bose propensity to sue...
>> still looking for the other lawsuit
>> bill
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose_Corporation#Legal_History
> I had heard about the Consumer Reports lawsuit but not the others.
> 73 de Mike W9OJ
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

TenTec mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>