[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] QST AD

To: Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] QST AD
From: Larry DiGioia <listacct@longwire.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 07:20:08 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I agree that QST never says anything bad. It's kind of boring. I wish 
Worldradio did HF rig reviews. I wish Kurt did HF rig reviews!

However, as far as the advertisers go, consider this:

You are an HF rig manufacturer. What are your choices of places to 

/If QST wrote some "bad" things in a review of your product, what would 
you do? Take your ad money and go elsewhere? Chances are, you are 
already spending a boatload of money to get maximum allowable space 

Can you picture Yaesu dropping their advertising in QST, for ANY reason? 
I can't.
Ron Castro wrote:

>At the end of the day, I'm sure it's more a matter of ad revenue for QST. 
>Rule #1 in the advertising business: Don't piss off the client!

Larry  N8KU

 w w w . l o n g w i r e . c o m
    100% CW     100% HF

TenTec mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>