TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] O1 vs. O2 and 1.372 vs. 2.03x • top & flops • reliability of so

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] O1 vs. O2 and 1.372 vs. 2.03x • top & flops • reliability of software
From: F3WT <ars.f3wt@wanadoo.fr>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:55:10 +0200
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi all,

I read very indulgent or  tolerant messages  about those $3k +    rigs .

  SW-experience tells one not to jump on buying  too  new releases !  
hi! although admittingly that finances continuous improvement releases.
But here we seem to have something worse  : a move into the opposite  
direction during a second stage rather than an improvement ( re.  
KAISEN) from the first, although due to a new DSP sourcing and   
coding ...

73's
Pierre. F3WT

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [TenTec] O1 vs. O2 and 1.372 vs. 2.03x • top & flops • reliability of software, F3WT <=