> I just read a review on eHam.net of the Jupiter. The ham
> gives it a "0" and calls it "junk." No specifics, just
> "junk." He complains that his first review disappeared from
> the eHam web site, and I hope it was done on purpose. What
> possible value is such a dumb "review"?
There's no value whatsoever. I've never used a Jup, so whether he's right
or wrong is beyond me. I think even the bottom of the barrel of eHam
readers ignore that kind of garbage. Something or someone pissed this
gentleman off, and he's looking for a dog to kick.
The level of insightful comment in his review pretty much gives the measure
of how much the "review" is worth.
TenTec mailing list