[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review
From: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:07:39 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
While I don't know if in this case the following is neccesarily true, always

There will always be those who will go out of their way to knock someone
else's product.

In some cases, they can only promote what they like by tearing down someone
In some cases, they can't believe someone else's high marks, and figure they
have to counter it.
In some cases, who knows?

But just as some on this reflector are called "zealots," there will always
be the "anti-zealots" out there.

Consider the source.  Consider his remarks.  File accordingly.

Oh, and if he doesn't want his Jupiter, then I can find a spot for it at the
new QTH.  Honest.

73, ron w3wn

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of John Rippey
Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006 10:22 PM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review

I just read a review on eHam.net of the Jupiter. The ham gives it a
"0" and calls it "junk." No specifics, just "junk." He complains that
his first review disappeared from the eHam web site, and I hope it
was done on purpose. What possible value is such a dumb "review"?

John, W3ULS
TenTec mailing list

TenTec mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>