TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] What version?

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] What version?
From: "Chuck Chandler" <charles_chandler@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:07:44 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
OK, I was curious... so I went and installed v1.373b5 this evening. Lasted about 1 hour. Went back to 2.056.

I had used 1.372 for a while, never tried 1.373b5 so I ws curious - some folks on the reflector like it a lot.

1.373b5 had GREAT NR, my TX audio sounded good in the monitor, FWIW. But, the sweep wouldn't keep up with all but the slowest tuning, the NR sometimes turned itself on and off without regard to the status displayed on the screen, and without NR engaged the bands sounded way harsh, raspy and hard to listen to.

OK, back to v2.056. All better, except the NR now is not too useful. Everything else works FB, though. The bands have magically cleared up - they sound the way I remember them sounding yesterday.

OBTW, I did my standard empirical test for noise... run the 500W amp into the dummy load, key the mike, remain silent and watch the power meter at its lowest setting while adjusting the SP. On v1.373b5 I could run anything up to 7 with no backgound noise - less than 1/2 watt indicated output. Running the SP at 8 gave me about 2 watts, at 9 gave me 5 watts, plus the scope showed a jagged audio signal. Thats about what I remember from 1.372 - IIRC, I ran the SP at 5 or 6 usually.

So, try it again with v2.056 loaded, and I can run the SP all the way up to 9, no problem, less than 1 watt output power. SP of 8 or less is very quiet, power meter hardly twitches.

So, not a scientific test, just my quick way of checking for hum RF hash, etc. in my audio. It does NOT mean that 2.056 has the same "talk power" that v1.3x did - but at least its clean audio.

Bottom line, v2.056 is better than I thought, and a bigger improvement over v1.372 than I remembered.

YMMV,
==============================
73 de Chuck, WS1L
charles_chandler@comcast.net
==============================
----- Original Message ----- From: <CATFISHTWO@aol.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] What version?



I was using 1.372 for quite a while but am now using 2.056 with no problems.
I did have to reset several parameters, ( tx eq, mic gain, sp on sb  and
several others, but I do like it now. it works.. I'm happy check out the shack

_http://hometown.aol.com/catfishtwo/N6AJR.html_
(http://hometown.aol.com/catfishtwo/N6AJR.html)

tom N6AJR

==============================================



In a message dated 7/18/2006 7:40:55 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
jhreed@chilitech.net writes:

Thank  you Brent, appreciate the comments... Jim Reed, ver 1.373b5
----- Original Message ----- From: R. Brent Zook
To:  Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006  10:24
Subject: Re: [TenTec] What version?


I use  version 1.372.  I don't care for the problems mentioned ad nauseum
on this site which are associated with Version 2, though version 2  seems
more stable.  And in version 1.373, I notice that the  automatic
selection of roofing filter is not tied as closely to the  selection of
the DSP bandwidth as it is in  1.372.





_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>