[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] "Being a Contrarian . . ."

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] "Being a Contrarian . . ."
From: K4IA@aol.com
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 10:19:55 EDT
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I thought the QST review was fairly negative.  A lot of "damning by  slight 
praise."  The overall tone of the review was negative with lots  of side 
remarks about shortcomings:
"it does so at the expense of certain features ... amateurs may well  have 
come to expect.
"hasn't addressed all the original Orion's shortcomings"
"falls short of the color screen implementations now commonplace  on 
competitor's products"
long discussion of a software crash that was fixed with 2.0b6
NR distortion - not as good as the original Orion (gee, where have we heard  
that before?)
complaints about the multi-knob to make adjustments
"Unfortunately TT made no effort to improve the band sweep and  metering"  
"Sweep has little or no practical value"
"No hint of an ALC function or measurement"
"Auto-notch ineffective under 230 hz"
But if you can make it to the end of the article without writing off the  
Orion II, they do conclude "the Orion II's performance will be a dream come 
for many discriminating radio amateurs."
I thought the RSGB article was a lot more positive.  

Craig  "Buck"
Fredericksburg, Virginia USA

TenTec mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>