TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] eHam Reviews

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] eHam Reviews
From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Reply-to: Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:28:08 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Maybe he likes the Swan because he can hear so much of the band all at once. 
Then if he waits five minutes, it drifts so far that he can hear a whole new 
part of the band!

Ron N6AHA

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 11:04 AM
Subject: [TenTec] eHam Reviews


> It appears that the original post regarding ON4UN's disposition of his
> Orions has been sent to the bit bucket, along with some others that were
> posted right after that in response.
>
> But for the first time in a long time I bothered to read through the
> comments overall.  Interesting points of view.  One guy even thought his
> Swan 500 was a better radio.  Also his Signal One (didn't say WHICH one),
> was "1000 time [sic] better".  He didn't say what that "1000 time" factor
> referred to, but I do hope he's enjoying that Swan :-)
>
> Sometimes you just have to shake your head ....
>
> Grant/NQ5T
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>