TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ARRL

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL
From: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:06:42 +0100
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Yes John, and that little work of art caused the industry to move their
first IF from 45 MHz, which was already bad enough, up to 70 MHz, which is
even worse.  As a result, it's even more difficult to build a decent roofing
filter for these rigs!

I would gladly sacrifice 6m and general coverage to have a low first IF at
HF frequencies.  You get a better box that way (as long as we consider that
price plays at least a remote role).

73
Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of John Geiger
Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Februar 2007 17:38
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL

They did figure out before others to add 6m to most HF
rigs.

73s John W5TD



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>