TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue
From: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Reply-to: geraldj@storm.weather.net,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:49:13 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 14:20 -0700, Paul Gates, KD3JF wrote:
> Mike that is the problem with the 706 having VHF, UHF. If I had a radio which 
> was for 160-10 I would be happy. You know why I feel that way? I am not an 
> engineer! I am not a complainer. I have a 706 MKIIG and my TenTec Triton IV 
> handles noise a lot better than the 706.

Since in VHF circles the 706 has a reputation for an ineffective noise
blanker, I went with the Yaesu 857D that does have an effective noise
blanker. In it I find the 500 Hz mechanical filter is better for pulling
out weak signals than the audio based DSP.

73, Jerry, K0CQ

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>