To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue |
From: | "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net> |
Reply-to: | geraldj@storm.weather.net,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:49:13 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 14:20 -0700, Paul Gates, KD3JF wrote: > Mike that is the problem with the 706 having VHF, UHF. If I had a radio which > was for 160-10 I would be happy. You know why I feel that way? I am not an > engineer! I am not a complainer. I have a 706 MKIIG and my TenTec Triton IV > handles noise a lot better than the 706. Since in VHF circles the 706 has a reputation for an ineffective noise blanker, I went with the Yaesu 857D that does have an effective noise blanker. In it I find the 500 Hz mechanical filter is better for pulling out weak signals than the audio based DSP. 73, Jerry, K0CQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue, Paul Gates, KD3JF |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue, Mike K9MI |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue, Paul Gates, KD3JF |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue, Mike K9MI |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |