| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] New Jupiter firmware |
| From: | Henry Mackey <kb9cqo@embarqmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 May 2008 11:04:49 -0400 (EDT) |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Yep, that'd be my guess as well. N9HM ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Cox" <jecox@tri-lakes.net> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 10:37:06 AM (GMT-0500) America/New_York Subject: Re: [TenTec] New Jupiter firmware Just guessing but from what the ten-tec rep posted I think that the two chips are the same form factor or physical size and that the large small aspect is in the memory size. This would mean that you would unplug the old one and replace it with the new one. 73, John kc0yai _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Early Ten-Tec's appropriate for a blind person?, Ed Malmgren |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] K3 information, Don Rasmussen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] New Jupiter firmware, John Cox |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni 546 Series C RF power amp advice sought (long post), Marinus Loewensteijn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |